2008 Conference Delegates attended from:

  • Argentina

    Argentina

  • Australia

    Australia

  • Austria

    Austria

  • Belgium

    Belgium

  • Belize

    Belize

  • Brazil

    Brazil

  • Brunei

    Brunei

  • Bulgaria

    Bulgaria

  • Canada

    Canada

  • Chile

    Chile

  • China

    China

  • Croatia

    Croatia

  • Cyprus

    Cyprus

  • Czech

    Czech

  • Denmark

    Denmark

  • Egypt

    Egypt

  • Finland

    Finland

  • France

    France

  • Germany

    Germany

  • Greece

    Greece

  • Hong Kong

    Hong Kong

  • Hungary

    Hungary

  • Iceland

    Iceland

  • India

    India

  • Indonesia

    Indonesia

  • Ireland

    Ireland

  • Israel

    Israel

  • Italy

    Italy

  • Japan

    Japan

  • Kuwait

    Kuwait

  • Latvia

    Latvia

  • Lebanon

    Lebanon

  • Lithuania

    Lithuania

  • Luxembourg

    Luxembourg

  • Mexico

    Mexico

  • Netherlands

    Netherlands

  • Norway

    Norway

  • Pakistan

    Pakistan

  • Poland

    Poland

  • Portugal

    Portugal

  • Russia

    Russia

  • Saudi Arabia

    Saudi Arabia

  • Singapore

    Singapore

  • Slovenia

    Slovenia

  • South Africa

    South Africa

  • South Korea

    South Korea

  • Spain

    Spain

  • Sweden

    Sweden

  • Switzerland

    Switzerland

  • Tanzania

    Tanzania

  • Turkey

    Turkey

  • UAE

    UAE

  • UK

    UK

  • USA

    USA

hashtag

Online Information Conference

THE INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY IN 2010 AND BEYOND

Repositories emerged in the late ninetines to provide researchers and other creators of digital content with usable and fast platforms to expose their content online. In 2003, it became clear that repositories would play a key role in the theme of Open Access, when the Berlin Declaration on Open Access Knowledge was first announced.   With vast numbers of funding bodies and institutions that signed this declaration, and established Open Access Mandates to support the declaration, repositories matured and  became strategic components in this landscape.  After ambitious projects in institutions, bolstering visions of Digital Preservation and stewardship over produced content, these repositories are online today, offering access to content from the world's leading research organizations and libraries. Trans-national projects, such as the EC's Europeana portal and DRIVER have aggregated content from different sources. These projects were possible through novel standards, such as the Open Archives Initiatives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. At the same time, google and other search indexes successfully crawl institutional repositories, resulting in an average of 60% of IR's visitor, originating from search engines.  The current state of the art still faces important challenges. Up until today, it's still easier to find out if you were mentioned in an online blog, than detect whether your research was cited in a published paper or conference proceeding. Repository managers are often faced with difficulties to motivate individual researchers to contribute to the institutional repositories. Unique author identification, copyrights and licenses remain topics to be addressed in current and future research. Furthermore, the question arises if harvesters and search engines are so successful in offering access to the contents of a repository, if there is still a need for repositories, in the form of web-based platforms, to offer this access.  The key argument why repositories are still here to stay, in 2010 and beyond, is the fact that these systems embody the commitment of both an institution's administration, as well as its researchers, to stewardship and long term preservation of the created content. An institutional repository clearly depicts the relation between an individual item, and the institution, which is sometimes less clear or explicit when the content ends up in search indexes or aggregators.  Emerging technologies and standards will enable uses of repositories and novel concepts in authoring of research or learning materials. With individual researchers and institutions guaranteeing the consistency of the individual item data, it will become possible to visualize citation networks as a basis for new notification systems.  Already today, companies such as @mire and Microsoft experiment with direct repository interaction, from within text and presentation editors. Searching for a (scientific) image, definition or publication, to cite in your document or presentation ? This can happen right from within the application. Trends and features from social networks are applied in Repositories under what is called Research 2.0, facilitating more rapid networking and interaction in research communities.

Speaker

 

 

Free Downloads

Online Information Speaker Podcast Series

Join our LinkedIn Group

Content Management

What do you see as the biggest obstacle preventing content management from moving to cloud computing?

Privacy and Security issues
Compliance & regulatory issues
Interoperability issues
Other

Mike McNamara, Director, X-Window Ltd
"The XML Pavilion provides a focus for visitors.  We have found that virtually everyone who walks on to our stand approaches us with direct and more in depth questions.  Companies recognise that they need to solve issues and this is an ideal platform.  The timing of the launch of the XML Pavilion is spot on.  Every session has been packed with visitors.  We've met lots of new prospects IMS is a foundation for a successful 2010 based on what we've seen here."

INCORPORATING:

 

IMS 2009 

PLATINUM CONFERENCE SPONSOR:

lexisnexis

 

DELEGATE DRINKS SPONSOR:

ProQuest

EUROPEAN LIBRARIANS THEATRE PARTNER:

EBSCO

OFFICIAL SHOW PUBLICATION:

IWR